Posted by Lachlan Newsome with 0 comment(s)
If you've ever turned on a television or logged onto a social media platform during the Trump era, you've probably come across the term "fake news". Now, fake news wasn't something birthed or spawned by Donald Trump. Rather, it's been used for centuries to manipulate public opinion. However, it surely reached new heights along the public consciousness under the 45th President's time in office. In fact, Trump often accuses different media outlets of being "fake news" whenever he doesn't like what they're writing about him. And that, my friends, is the beauty of Communications 102.
When it comes to convenience, nothing beats having a one-size-fits-all rebuttal like: "That's fake news." It's the new "talk to the hand", effective in dispatching unwanted arguments and challenging viewpoints. It's like the magic shield in video games - put it up and suddenly every accusation, every piece of negative feedback, every unflattering picture becomes null and void. Can you imagine having that kind of power? Heck, I wouldn't mind being able to shut down my neighbor's constant complaints about my lawn with: "That’s fake news, Greg! My grass is green as a crisp dollar bill!" Unfortunately, we can't all be Donald Trump.
Undeniably, Trump had a notable impact on amplifying the concept of fake news during his presidency. It's astonishing just how much he used that term - it was like the "stunning" to his Heidi Klum. With one swift claim, he could label an entire news organization as peddlers of false information. This wasn't just a clever deflection technique; it was an effective strategy in shaping public perception and sowing doubt.
It's interesting how this term has evolved over time. Years ago, "fake news" was associated with satirical comedy shows, complete with a comedic host and an outspoken studio audience. However, it has been transformed into an all-encompassing, political tool. Now, isn't that a funny twist? It's kind of like discovering that your nerdy, science-project partner from high school is now a superhero. Only this time, the transformation yields a much darker storyline.
Despite its seemingly humorous origin, the term "fake news" has created real difficulties for journalists. Once a story or report is labeled as "fake", viewers start questioning the credibility of the information. This has serious repercussions on the freedom of the press and also on informed citizenry, something that is incredibly integral to a functioning democracy.
I remember when I started my career in blogging, I was told that being truthful and objective was the golden rule. Unfortunately, being accused of spreading "fake news" can seriously tarnish a journalist's credibility. It's like having a giant red F stamped on your work, even when everyone else can clearly see your masterful use of Oxford commas and properly referenced footnotes.
To counter this fake news narrative, media organizations have increased their fact-checking efforts. Truth and fact - the bread and butter of journalism - have become their defense against growing mistrust and increasing skepticism. And while we're on the topic, let me say this: As much as gravity or taxes, fact-checking is an unending, constant reality of the journalism world.
In my own blogging experience, I have found that rigorous fact-checking not only ensures the accuracy of published information but also builds readers' trust. Let's admit it, dear readers, you wouldn’t be here reading my musings if it weren’t for that mutual trust, right? You stick around because you know good old Lachlan is dishing out fully vetted, trustworthy information (with a signature dash of humor).
Let's not forget about the role of social media in this phenomenon. With the rapid dissemination of information online, it's become even more challenging to separate truth from fiction. As any avid Facebook or Twitter user can tell you, tweets and posts can often represent a distortion of reality.
Social media is like that friend who always tells stories in the most animated, exaggerated way. It's entertaining, but if you're looking for reliable information, you might need to look elsewhere. But guess what? That's where we bloggers and journalists come in. Like superheroes in the world of storytelling, we help sift through the credible and the non-credible, separating the wheat from the chaff. Now, if only I had a cape...
You know, I've always believed that with awareness comes change. By understanding the impact of "fake news" and recognizing when someone uses it as a defense mechanism, we can take back control. The next time you hear anyone, from high-ranking politicians to your neighbor Greg, dismissing something as "fake news", take a moment to question it. Is it really? Or are they merely trying to silence the opposing views?
Remember, dear readers, we all carry a measure of responsibility in upholding truth in the public sphere. Let's not allow "fake news" to be a convenient cover-up for uncomfortable truths. It's like that time I broke aunt Maggie’s vase and blamed it on the cat - easy to do, but definitely not the right thing.
Like him or not, it's pretty clear that Trump had a significant role in popularizing the term "fake news". It became yet another gimmick in the chaotic circus that is politics. But hey, that's just the nature of the beast, isn't it?
Don't get me wrong, I admire how Trump flipped the script, managed to spruce up an old ploy, and spun it into his golden strategy. I can also see how using such a phrase so cavalierly can be an issue. One thing is for sure, though: Donald Trump surely left us something significant to remember him by - a phrase that incites conversations, debates, and an undeniable ripple effect in the world of news and journalism. And that, my friends, as they say, is another story for another day.